pizza: be called pizza

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.68
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, frozen food
Weight: 0.66
, junk food
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.37
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, burrito
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.36
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called pizza 1.00
is pizza 0.98
be like pizza called 0.98
be like pizza 0.97
be named pizza 0.94
is best pizza 0.94
be better than pizza 0.92
be called pizzas 0.90
is pizza stock 0.88
have pizza sauce 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pizza, be called pizza)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pizza, be called pizza)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, have pizza sauce)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(taco bell, have pizza sauce)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(taco bell, have pizza sauce)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pizza, be called pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pizza, be called pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(taco bell, have pizza sauce)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pizza, be called pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)