hot dog: taste better at ballpark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better at ballpark 1.00
taste better day after 0.78
taste better next day 0.78
be expensive at baseball games 0.77
taste good 0.76
get taste 0.76
be sold at baseball games 0.76
be better than home 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pet food, get taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pet food, get taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pet food, get taste)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(twinkies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(twinkies, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hot dog, taste better at ballpark)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be expensive at baseball games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(hot dog, be expensive at baseball games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be expensive at baseball games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be sold at baseball games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(hot dog, be sold at baseball games)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be sold at baseball games)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hot dog, be expensive at baseball games)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hot dog, be sold at baseball games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hot dog, taste better at ballpark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pet food, get taste)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, taste better at ballpark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)