housing: is unaffordable

Related concepts

Parents	concern Weight: 0.63 , real estate Weight: 0.63 , department Weight: 0.61 , commodity Weight: 0.60
Siblings	condo Weight: 0.34 , condominium Weight: 0.34 , townhouse Weight: 0.33 , real estate agent Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is unaffordable	1.00
become unaffordable	0.98
is expensive	0.77
be expensive in bracknell	0.77
be in barrhaven expensive	0.77
get expensive	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(real estate, get expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(housing, is unaffordable)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(housing, is unaffordable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(real estate, get expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(real estate, get expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(condominium, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(condo, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(real estate, get expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(housing, is unaffordable)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(housing, is unaffordable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(condo, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(condo, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(condominium, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(condominium, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(townhouse, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(housing, is unaffordable)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(housing, become unaffordable)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(housing, become unaffordable)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(housing, become unaffordable)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(housing, become unaffordable)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bracknell)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in bracknell)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in bracknell)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in bracknell)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(housing, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(housing, get expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(housing, get expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(housing, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(housing, get expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(housing, is expensive)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(housing, get expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(housing, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(housing, is unaffordable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(real estate, get expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(condominium, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(townhouse, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(condo, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(housing, is unaffordable) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(real estate, get expensive)