real estate agent: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be in barrhaven expensive 0.98
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
is cheaper 0.85
drive expensive cars 0.80
is cheap 0.79
be cheaper in south 0.79
use cost 0.77
be expensive in india 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(real estate, get expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(real estate, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be cheaper in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(individual, use cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(real estate, get expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(real estate, get more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(individual, use cost)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(real estate, be cheaper in south)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate, get more expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(real estate, get expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be cheaper in south)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, is cheap)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(individual, use cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(real estate, get expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(real estate, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be cheaper in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(individual, use cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(condo, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(condo, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(real estate agent, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(individual, use cost)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheaper in south)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, is cheap)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate, get expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate, get more expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(townhouse, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condo, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(client, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate, get expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate, get more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheaper in south)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(individual, use cost)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)