client: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	creditor Weight: 0.63 , family member Weight: 0.62 , enterprise Weight: 0.61 , partner Weight: 0.61
Siblings	real estate agent Weight: 0.67 , owner Weight: 0.63 , drug dealer Weight: 0.63 , samsung Weight: 0.62 , rolling stone Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is more expensive	0.94
be more expensive than alamo	0.88
is cheaper	0.85
buy expensive cars	0.85
drive expensive cars	0.80
be more expensive than iphone	0.79
is cheap	0.79
be more expensive in korea	0.78
be cheaper than apple	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(enterprise, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(enterprise, is cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive in korea)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(enterprise, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(enterprise, is cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(real estate agent, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(samsung, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(samsung, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(real estate agent, drive expensive cars) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive than iphone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(samsung, be more expensive in korea) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(samsung, be more expensive in korea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(client, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(enterprise, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive than iphone)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than apple)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(real estate agent, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(samsung, be more expensive in korea)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(enterprise, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheap)