enterprise: is cheaper

Related concepts

Parents	company Weight: 0.62 , sector Weight: 0.61 , application Weight: 0.58 , organization Weight: 0.57
Siblings	real estate Weight: 0.67 , government Weight: 0.65 , corporation Weight: 0.65 , oil company Weight: 0.63 , client Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is cheaper	1.00
is more expensive	0.86
is expensive	0.85
is cheap	0.83
be more expensive than alamo	0.83
be cheaper than hertz	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(client, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(real estate, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(real estate, is cheap) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(real estate, is cheap)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(client, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(client, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(enterprise, is cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(enterprise, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(enterprise, be cheaper than hertz)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(enterprise, be cheaper than hertz)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheap)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(enterprise, be cheaper than hertz)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be cheaper than hertz)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is expensive)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is more expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheap)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(enterprise, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheap)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(enterprise, is cheap)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(real estate, is cheap)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(client, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(enterprise, is cheaper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)