hsbc: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bank
Weight: 0.68
, financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.60
, giant
Weight: 0.54
, client
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ubs
Weight: 0.36
, online banking
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, reserve bank
Weight: 0.34
, banking
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good company work for 0.78
be good company work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(client, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(online banking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(banking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(online banking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(online banking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hsbc, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, be good company work for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, be good company work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hsbc, be good company work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hsbc, be good company work for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hsbc, be good company work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hsbc, be good company work for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hsbc, be good company work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hsbc, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(banking, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(online banking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)