hud: pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.51
, display
Weight: 0.50
, department
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, arthur
Weight: 0.32
, avengers
Weight: 0.32
, apache
Weight: 0.32
, shrek
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay 1.00
ask for salary 0.78
cost money 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(application, ask for salary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hud, pay)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hud, pay)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(application, ask for salary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(application, ask for salary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(application, ask for salary)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hud, pay)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hud, pay)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hud, pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hud, pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hud, pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(application, ask for salary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(hud, pay)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(application, ask for salary)