hug: be from better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, support
Weight: 0.57
, greeting
Weight: 0.52
, contact
Weight: 0.51
, time
Weight: 0.45
Siblings kiss
Weight: 0.35
, smile
Weight: 0.33
, smiling
Weight: 0.33
, kissing
Weight: 0.33
, laugh
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from better 1.00
be from behind better 0.87
be good for us 0.78
feel good 0.75
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(support, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(support, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(greeting, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(support, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(kissing, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(smiling, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smile, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smiling, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kissing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(kiss, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(kiss, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hug, be from better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(support, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hug, be from better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hug, be from better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(kiss, feel good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kiss, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(kiss, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(kiss, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(smiling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smiling, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kissing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kissing, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smiling, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(smiling, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(smile, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(kissing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kissing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hug, be from better)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hug, be from behind better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hug, be from behind better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hug, be from behind better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hug, be good for us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, be good for us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hug, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hug, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hug, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hug, be good for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hug, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hug, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from behind better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hug, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hug, feel good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(greeting, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(support, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(kiss, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(smiling, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(kiss, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kissing, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(smiling, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(kissing, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(smile, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(greeting, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(support, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hug, be from better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)