hug: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, support
Weight: 0.57
, greeting
Weight: 0.52
, contact
Weight: 0.51
, time
Weight: 0.45
Siblings kiss
Weight: 0.35
, smile
Weight: 0.33
, smiling
Weight: 0.33
, kissing
Weight: 0.33
, laugh
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
feel good 0.80
be good for us 0.80
feel great 0.78
be from better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(support, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(support, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(greeting, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(support, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smile, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smiling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kissing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(kissing, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(kiss, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(smiling, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(kiss, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hug, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(support, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hug, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(greeting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hug, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(kiss, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(kiss, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kissing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(kissing, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smiling, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(smiling, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(smile, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(kiss, feel good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kiss, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(smiling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smiling, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(kissing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kissing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hug, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hug, feel good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hug, be good for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hug, feel great)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hug, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, be good for us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, feel great)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hug, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hug, be from better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hug, be good for us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hug, feel great)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hug, be from better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hug, be from better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hug, be good for us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hug, feel good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hug, feel great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hug, be from better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hug, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(greeting, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(support, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(kiss, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(kiss, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(smiling, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(smiling, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(kissing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(smile, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kissing, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(greeting, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(support, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)