human eye: be very delicate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents eye
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, lens
Weight: 0.62
, camera
Weight: 0.60
, image
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.36
, human life
Weight: 0.36
, eye contact
Weight: 0.35
, human body
Weight: 0.35
, human head
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very delicate 1.00
be very fragile 0.84
be fragile 0.78
be very complex 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(human body, be fragile)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(human body, be fragile)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(human body, be fragile)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(human eye, be very delicate)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(human eye, be very fragile)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(human eye, be very complex)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(human eye, be very fragile)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very fragile)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(human eye, be very fragile)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(human eye, be very complex)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very complex)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(human eye, be very complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human eye, be very delicate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(human body, be fragile)