humor: be understanding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, warmth
Weight: 0.34
, character
Weight: 0.34
, wit
Weight: 0.34
, intellect
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be understanding 1.00
be dependon understanding 1.00
be dependon understanding of wordplay 0.78
be understanding of wordplay 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(humor, be understanding)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(humor, be understanding of wordplay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humor, be understanding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(humor, be understanding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding)