humor: be understanding of wordplay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, warmth
Weight: 0.34
, character
Weight: 0.34
, wit
Weight: 0.34
, intellect
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dependon understanding of wordplay 1.00
be understanding of wordplay 1.00
be understanding 0.78
be dependon understanding 0.78
be different than humor 0.77
be superior to humor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(humor, be dependon understanding of wordplay)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(humor, be understanding)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(humor, be dependon understanding)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(humor, be understanding)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humor, be understanding)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humor, be dependon understanding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(humor, be understanding of wordplay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(humor, be understanding of wordplay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(humor, be understanding of wordplay)