hunger: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to change 0.87
be related to process 0.83
be associated with use 0.82
be related to social change 0.81
solve related 0.80
be associated with use of resources 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(symptom, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hunger, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hunger, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(need, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hunger, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(need, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(symptom, be related to process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(need, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(symptom, be related to process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(need, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hunger, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(symptom, be related to process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hunger, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hunger, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(famine, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(famine, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(hunger, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hunger, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(need, be related)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(symptom, be related to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(famine, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(need, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(symptom, be related to process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hunger, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)