hunter: bag animal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.66
, warrior
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.60
, class
Weight: 0.60
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, fisherman
Weight: 0.35
, fisher
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
bag animal 1.00
be bag duck 0.87
bag deer 0.86
carry bag 0.85
hunt animal 0.79
bag prey 0.79
hurt animal 0.79
kill animal 0.79
be at hunter pouch 0.77
land wild animal 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, hunt animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunter, bag animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(man, hunt animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(man, hunt animal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, hunt animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hunter, bag animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hunter, bag animal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunter, be bag duck)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(hunter, be bag duck)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hunter, bag deer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hunter, bag deer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hunter, be bag duck)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bag deer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hunter, kill animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hunter, kill animal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hunter, hurt animal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hunter, hurt animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hunter, land wild animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hunter, land wild animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hunter, hurt animal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunter, land wild animal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunter, land wild animal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunter, bag deer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hunter, hurt animal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hunter, kill animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hunter, be bag duck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bag animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunter, bag animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(man, hunt animal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hunter, bag animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(man, hunt animal)