hunter: have kill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.66
, warrior
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.60
, class
Weight: 0.60
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, fisherman
Weight: 0.35
, fisher
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have kill 1.00
kill 0.98
kill animals 0.87
kill helpful animals 0.81
kill bears 0.81
kill birds 0.80
kill wild animals 0.79
kill lions 0.78
kill wolves 0.78
kill deer 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, kill)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(young man, kill birds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(young man, kill birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(young man, kill birds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fox, kill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hunter, have kill)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunter, kill)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(hunter, kill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(hunter, kill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunter, kill deer)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hunter, have kill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fox, kill)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(young man, kill birds)