hunter: kill bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.66
, warrior
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.60
, class
Weight: 0.60
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, fisherman
Weight: 0.35
, fisher
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
kill bears 1.00
eat grizzly bears 0.87
kill animals 0.84
kill wolves 0.82
kill lions 0.82
kill 0.81
have kill 0.81
kill deer 0.81
kill wild animals 0.81
kill birds 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(young man, kill birds)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, kill)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(young man, kill birds)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(young man, kill birds)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, kill)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fox, kill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hunter, kill bears)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunter, kill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(hunter, kill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunter, have kill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hunter, have kill)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunter, kill bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(young man, kill birds)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hunter, kill bears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(fox, kill)