hunting: affect wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect wildlife 1.00
be to wildlife management 0.92
preserve wildlife 0.92
be on wildlife refuges 0.88
is conservation 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is conservation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hunting, is conservation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hunting, is conservation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hunting, is conservation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wildlife management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)