hunting: be on wildlife refuges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on wildlife refuges 1.00
affect wildlife 0.88
preserve wildlife 0.87
be to wildlife management 0.87
is conservation 0.78
make animals extinct 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hunting, affect wildlife)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hunting, is conservation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hunting, make animals extinct)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(hunting, make animals extinct)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect wildlife)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunting, make animals extinct)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect wildlife)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hunting, affect wildlife)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hunting, is conservation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hunting, preserve wildlife)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hunting, make animals extinct)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hunting, is conservation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is conservation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wildlife management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wildlife management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunting, be on wildlife refuges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hunting, be on wildlife refuges)