hybrid: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.60
, model
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.61
, centaur
Weight: 0.52
, roadster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
be more efficient than non-hybrids 0.98
is efficient 0.97
is more expensive 0.83
cost more 0.79
be better than active 0.78
is cheaper 0.77
is expensive 0.76
be better for environment 0.75
is easier 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(roadster, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(roadster, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(roadster, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hybrid, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hybrid, is efficient)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hybrid, is efficient)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hybrid, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is efficient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better than active)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hybrid, cost more)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hybrid, is easier)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better than active)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hybrid, cost more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is easier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybrid, cost more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is easier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hybrid, is cheaper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, cost more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hybrid, is easier)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hybrid, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hybrid, is cheaper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hybrid, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(roadster, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hybrid, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)