hybrid: be better than active

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.60
, model
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.61
, centaur
Weight: 0.52
, roadster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than active 1.00
be more efficient than non-hybrids 0.82
is stronger 0.79
be better for environment 0.78
be better in way 0.78
is more efficient 0.78
has quality better 0.77
is more likely 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(option, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(option, is more likely)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(option, is more likely)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better than active)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(option, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better than active)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better than active)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is stronger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hybrid, is stronger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is stronger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more likely)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hybrid, is stronger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hybrid, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hybrid, is more likely)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is more likely)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hybrid, is more efficient)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hybrid, is more likely)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hybrid, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(option, is more likely)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(option, is more likely)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(hybrid, be better than active) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)