hybrid: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.60
, model
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.61
, centaur
Weight: 0.52
, roadster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better in way 0.84
be better for environment 0.83
be good for environment 0.77
be better than active 0.77
is stronger 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(roadster, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(centaur, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(centaur, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hybrid, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(centaur, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(centaur, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(centaur, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(centaur, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(roadster, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(roadster, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hybrid, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hybrid, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hybrid, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(hybrid, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hybrid, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better than active)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hybrid, is stronger)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better than active)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is stronger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is stronger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hybrid, is stronger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(centaur, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(roadster, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(centaur, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hybrid, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)