hybrid: be better in way

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.60
, model
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.61
, centaur
Weight: 0.52
, roadster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better in way 1.00
be better for environment 0.85
has quality better 0.84
is easier 0.78
be better than active 0.78
be good for environment 0.78
is stronger 0.76
be more efficient than non-hybrids 0.76
be bad for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better in way)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better in way)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hybrid, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hybrid, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hybrid, be more efficient than non-hybrids)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hybrid, is easier)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is easier)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better than active)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is easier)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, is stronger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hybrid, is stronger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hybrid, is easier)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better than active)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better than active)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hybrid, is stronger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hybrid, is stronger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hybrid, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hybrid, be better for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better than active)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hybrid, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hybrid, be good for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hybrid, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybrid, be better in way)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hybrid, be better in way)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)