hybridization: affect electronegativity

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.61 , concept Weight: 0.57 , step Weight: 0.56 , process Weight: 0.54 , factor Weight: 0.53
Siblings	synthesis Weight: 0.34 , speciation Weight: 0.33 , meiosis Weight: 0.32 , phagocytosis Weight: 0.32 , replication Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect electronegativity	1.00
affect effect	0.89
mean	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(process, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(concept, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(concept, mean)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(process, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(concept, mean)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(process, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(replication, mean)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(speciation, mean)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(synthesis, mean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(process, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(concept, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(synthesis, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(synthesis, mean)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(speciation, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(speciation, mean)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(replication, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(replication, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(hybridization, affect effect)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(hybridization, affect effect)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(hybridization, mean)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(hybridization, mean)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(hybridization, mean)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect effect)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(process, mean)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(concept, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(synthesis, mean)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(speciation, mean)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(replication, mean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(process, mean)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(concept, mean)