hybridization: be useful describing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, step
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings synthesis
Weight: 0.34
, speciation
Weight: 0.33
, meiosis
Weight: 0.32
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.32
, replication
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful describing 1.00
is useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybridization, be useful describing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hybridization, be useful describing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hybridization, be useful describing)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hybridization, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hybridization, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hybridization, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, be useful describing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hybridization, be useful describing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hybridization, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)