hydra: is system inefficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.60
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, constellation
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.53
Siblings medusa
Weight: 0.34
, creature
Weight: 0.33
, chimera
Weight: 0.33
, cyclops
Weight: 0.33
, amoeba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is system inefficient 1.00
is digestive system inefficient 0.88
has quality system 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hydra, is system inefficient)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hydra, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hydra, has quality system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hydra, is system inefficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hydra, is system inefficient)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hydra, is system inefficient)