hysterectomy: be considered surgery

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.76
, surgery
Weight: 0.76
, operation
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.55
, treatment
Weight: 0.55
Siblings mastectomy
Weight: 0.41
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.40
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.39
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.38
, prostatectomy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered surgery 1.00
is surgery 0.97
be considered major surgery 0.95
is major surgery 0.92
be called plastic surgery 0.91
is procedure 0.78
be vs lumpectomy 0.76
be needed for knee injuries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surgery, is procedure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surgery, be needed for knee injuries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(surgery, is procedure)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(surgery, be needed for knee injuries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be needed for knee injuries)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, is major surgery)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be called plastic surgery)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surgery, is procedure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surgery, be needed for knee injuries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mastectomy, is surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be called plastic surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be called plastic surgery)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(mastectomy, is major surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, is major surgery)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is surgery)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered major surgery)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is surgery)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major surgery)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is surgery)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(surgery, is procedure)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(surgery, be needed for knee injuries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be called plastic surgery)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mastectomy, is major surgery)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(surgery, is procedure)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(surgery, be needed for knee injuries)