mastectomy: be vs lumpectomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.77
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.57
, surgery
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.41
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.39
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.37
, prostatectomy
Weight: 0.37
, amputation
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs lumpectomy 1.00
is surgery 0.77
be considered surgery 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is surgery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is surgery)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hysterectomy, be considered surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mastectomy, is surgery)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, is surgery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is surgery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, be vs lumpectomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, be considered surgery)