:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(i, be at nevada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(i, be at tulsa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(i, be at oregon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(i, be at nevada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(i, be at oregon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(i, be at alaska)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(i, be at texas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(i, be at texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(i, be at tulsa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(i, be at alabama)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(i, be at florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(i, be at alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(i, be at chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(i, be at texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(i, be at tulsa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(i, be at tulsa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(i, be at arizona)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(i, be at texas)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible