i: be at oregon

Property	Similarity
be at oregon	1.00
be at alabama	0.83
be at florida	0.82
be at arizona	0.81
be at alaska	0.80
be at colorado	0.80
be at nevada	0.79
be at texas	0.79
be at washington	0.78
be at tulsa	0.77

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(i, be at alabama)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(i, be at florida)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(i, be at arizona)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(i, be at arizona)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(i, be at alaska)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(i, be at colorado)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(i, be at nevada)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(i, be at texas)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(i, be at washington)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(i, be at alabama)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(i, be at colorado)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(i, be at tulsa)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(i, be at nevada)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(i, be at washington)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(i, be at tulsa)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(i, be at florida)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(i, be at texas)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(i, be at alaska)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(i, be at alabama)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(i, be at arizona)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(i, be at florida)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(i, be at colorado)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(i, be at alaska)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(i, be at tulsa)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(i, be at texas)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(i, be at washington)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(i, be at nevada)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(i, be at florida)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(i, be at alabama)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(i, be at nevada)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(i, be at alaska)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(i, be at texas)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(i, be at colorado)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(i, be at arizona)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(i, be at washington)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(i, be at oregon) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(i, be at tulsa)

i: be at oregon

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Parents	-
Siblings	-