:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(i, be at maine)
Similarity expansion
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(i, be at alaska)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(i, be at oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(i, be at alabama)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(i, be at florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(i, be at oregon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(i, be at alaska)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(i, be at alabama)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(i, be at florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(i, be at oregon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(i, be at florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(i, be at alaska)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(i, be at alaska)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(i, be at alabama)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(i, be at alabama)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(i, be at oregon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(i, be at florida)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at maine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(i, be at maine)