Dice
About
Dialogues
Browse full collection
i
:
be at new york
from
ConceptNet
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Related concepts
Parents
-
Siblings
-
Related properties
Property
Similarity
be at new york
1.00
be at new hampshire
0.79
be at washington
0.76
be at chicago
0.75
Priors about this statement
Cues
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Joint
Necessity
Sufficiency
Implication
Entailment
Contradiction
Entropy
Evidence
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight:
0.28
Evidence weight:
0.93
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.89
Plausible(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.69
¬ Salient(
i
,
be at new york
)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
1.00
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.00
Remarkable(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.00
¬ Remarkable(
i
,
be at new hampshire
)
0.65
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.97
Typical(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.99
¬ Typical(
i
,
be at new hampshire
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.97
Typical(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.58
¬ Typical(
i
,
be at chicago
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.97
Typical(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.87
¬ Typical(
i
,
be at washington
)
0.62
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.96
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.00
Remarkable(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.04
¬ Remarkable(
i
,
be at washington
)
0.61
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.91
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.89
Plausible(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.83
¬ Plausible(
i
,
be at new hampshire
)
0.60
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.93
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.00
Remarkable(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.07
¬ Remarkable(
i
,
be at chicago
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.89
Plausible(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.91
¬ Plausible(
i
,
be at washington
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.89
Plausible(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.96
¬ Plausible(
i
,
be at chicago
)
0.55
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.82
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.69
Salient(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.59
¬ Salient(
i
,
be at new hampshire
)
0.51
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.79
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.69
Salient(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.67
¬ Salient(
i
,
be at washington
)
0.49
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.76
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.69
Salient(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.79
¬ Salient(
i
,
be at chicago
)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight:
0.14
Evidence weight:
1.00
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.69
Salient(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.97
¬ Typical(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.00
¬ Remarkable(
i
,
be at new york
)
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight:
0.48
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.89
Plausible(
i
,
be at new york
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.97
¬ Typical(
i
,
be at new york
)