i: be at new hampshire

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new hampshire 1.00
be at new york 0.79
be at oregon 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(i, be at new hampshire)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, be at new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(i, be at new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(i, be at oregon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(i, be at oregon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(i, be at new york)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, be at new hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(i, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(i, be at new hampshire)