i: be at san diego

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at san diego 1.00
gon na get you sucker 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(i, be at san diego)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, gon na get you sucker)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(i, gon na get you sucker)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(i, gon na get you sucker)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(i, gon na get you sucker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, be at san diego)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(i, be at san diego)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(i, be at san diego)