i: gon na get you sucker

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
gon na get you sucker 1.00
be at san diego 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(i, gon na get you sucker)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, be at san diego)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(i, be at san diego)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(i, be at san diego)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(i, be at san diego)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(i, gon na get you sucker)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(i, gon na get you sucker)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(i, gon na get you sucker)