ice hockey: be played

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.71
, winter
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.39
, ice skating
Weight: 0.38
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played 1.00
is game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hockey, is game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ice hockey, be played)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ice hockey, is game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hockey, is game)