:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hockey, be played)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)