hockey: be played on wet pitch

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played on wet pitch 1.00
be played on wet field 0.94
be played on ice 0.83
be played 0.82
was played 0.82
is played in winter 0.82
play 0.80
is game 0.77
use ball 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be played)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ice hockey, is game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hockey, use ball)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hockey, is game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hockey, use ball)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is played in winter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hockey, is played in winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hockey, is played in winter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, is played in winter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hockey, use ball)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hockey, be played)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hockey, was played)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hockey, is game)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is game)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)