ice hockey: was discovered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.71
, winter
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.39
, ice skating
Weight: 0.38
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was discovered 1.00
was created 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hockey, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hockey, was created)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ice skating, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ice hockey, was discovered)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ice hockey, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ice skating, was created)