ice skating: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents winter
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rink
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, ice climbing
Weight: 0.37
, skating
Weight: 0.36
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was invented 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ice hockey, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ice skating, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ice skating, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ice skating, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ice skating, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was invented)