ice skating: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents winter
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rink
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, ice climbing
Weight: 0.37
, skating
Weight: 0.36
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
was created 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ice skating, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ice skating, was created)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ice skating, was created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ice skating, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ice skating, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, was invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was invented)