ice hockey: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.71
, winter
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.39
, ice skating
Weight: 0.38
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(winter, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(winter, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(winter, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ice hockey, was made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(winter, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hockey, was made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(winter, was made)