ice: be at drink

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ice cream
Weight: 0.77
, cold
Weight: 0.65
, force
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
, dairy product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.33
, chocolate
Weight: 0.32
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.32
, ocean
Weight: 0.31
, boulder
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drink 1.00
be used to drink 0.98
be at mix drink 0.88
be good to drink champagne 0.86
be eat 0.76
be used to eat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ocean, be used to drink)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be used to eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ocean, be used to drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ocean, be used to drink)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate, be used to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chocolate, be eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ice, be at drink)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ice, be used to drink)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ice, be at mix drink)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at mix drink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ice, be at mix drink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ice, be used to drink)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice, be used to drink)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ice, be used to drink)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ice, be at mix drink)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ice, be at drink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chocolate, be eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chocolate, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ocean, be used to drink)