ice: be good to drink champagne

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ice cream
Weight: 0.77
, cold
Weight: 0.65
, force
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
, dairy product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.33
, chocolate
Weight: 0.32
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.32
, ocean
Weight: 0.31
, boulder
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good to drink champagne 1.00
be at drink 0.86
be used to drink 0.86
be at mix drink 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ocean, be used to drink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ocean, be used to drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ocean, be used to drink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ice, be used to drink)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ice, be at drink)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ice, be at mix drink)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at mix drink)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ice, be at mix drink)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ice, be at mix drink)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ice, be at drink)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ice, be at drink)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at drink)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ice, be used to drink)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice, be used to drink)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ice, be used to drink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice, be good to drink champagne)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ice, be good to drink champagne) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ocean, be used to drink)