icing sugar: taste different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, recipe
Weight: 0.48
, good
Weight: 0.32
Siblings refined sugar
Weight: 0.35
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.33
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, lime juice
Weight: 0.33
, coconut
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste different 1.00
taste good 0.93
taste bad 0.92
taste eating 0.85
taste like soap 0.81
be different 0.79
look different 0.78
is tasting food unhealthy 0.77
smells good 0.76
smells smell good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(recipe, be different)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(icing sugar, taste different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(recipe, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(recipe, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(milk chocolate, taste different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(milk chocolate, taste eating)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(recipe, be different)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(milk chocolate, taste different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(milk chocolate, taste different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(milk chocolate, taste eating)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(milk chocolate, taste eating)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(refined sugar, be different)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, be different)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(icing sugar, taste different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(icing sugar, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(recipe, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, taste eating)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(refined sugar, be different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, taste different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(icing sugar, taste different)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(recipe, be different)