icon: were important to eastern orthodox

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.67
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings american flag
Weight: 0.66
, arrow
Weight: 0.66
, ray charles
Weight: 0.65
, elvis
Weight: 0.64
, superman
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important to eastern orthodox 1.00
were important to orthodox 0.92
were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox 0.91
be used by orthodox 0.88
be important to orthodox church 0.87
be used by non orthodox 0.85
be used in orthodox churches 0.85
were such important issue in split between orthodox 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used by orthodox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)