icon: were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.67
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings american flag
Weight: 0.66
, arrow
Weight: 0.66
, ray charles
Weight: 0.65
, elvis
Weight: 0.64
, superman
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox 1.00
were such important issue in split between orthodox 0.97
were important to eastern orthodox 0.91
were such important issue in split 0.89
were important to orthodox 0.85
be used by non orthodox 0.81
be used by orthodox 0.81
be important to orthodox church 0.80
be used in orthodox churches 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(icon, be used in orthodox churches)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between orthodox)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(icon, be used by non orthodox)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(icon, be important to orthodox church)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(icon, were important to orthodox)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(icon, were important to eastern orthodox)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(icon, were such important issue in split)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(icon, be used by orthodox)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(icon, were important to orthodox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(icon, were such important issue in split between eastern orthodox)