illinois: be good place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place live 1.00
be worst state live in 0.77
be worst state live 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ohio, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(illinois, be good place live)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(illinois, be worst state live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)