illiteracy: has state states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state states 1.00
be in states 0.95
be in states brainly 0.95
be in state 0.86
be greater in states 0.82
be by state 0.81
be in united states brainly 0.81
be in united states 0.81
is united states 0.81
be in current state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(problem, be in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state states)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(problem, be in united states)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in united states)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in united states)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be greater in states)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in current state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(problem, be in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state states)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(inequality, be greater in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, be greater in states)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(inequality, be in current state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in current state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hunger, be in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in united states)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(illiteracy, has state states)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is united states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(illiteracy, is united states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is united states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is united states)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be by state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(problem, be in united states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, be greater in states)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, be in united states)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(inequality, be in current state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(illiteracy, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(problem, be in united states)