illiteracy: be by state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be by state 1.00
be in state 0.93
be by country 0.86
be in current state 0.82
has state states 0.81
be in burundi 0.77
be in yosemite 0.77
be in zns 0.77
has state problem 0.76
be reported/resolved 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(issue, be reported/resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(problem, be in yosemite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(challenge, be in zns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(challenge, be in zns)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(problem, be in yosemite)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(issue, be reported/resolved)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in yosemite)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be in zns)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, be reported/resolved)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in current state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in burundi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(problem, be in yosemite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(challenge, be in zns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(issue, be reported/resolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hunger, be in burundi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in burundi)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(inequality, be in current state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in current state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be by state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(illiteracy, has state states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be by country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be by country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(illiteracy, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be by state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(issue, be reported/resolved)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(challenge, be in zns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(problem, be in yosemite)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(inequality, be in current state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hunger, be in burundi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(issue, be reported/resolved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(challenge, be in zns)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(problem, be in yosemite)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(illiteracy, be by state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)